Impact of Patients’ Health Literacy on the Adoption of Medical Teleconsultation: Evidence From France
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v10.548Keywords:
E-health, France, patient empowerment, structural equation modeling, technology acceptance model, teleconsultation adoption , teleconsultation adoptionAbstract
Objectives: Medical teleconsultation is a key solution to improve access to healthcare, particularly during crises. This study examines the influence of patients’ health literacy on the adoption of medical teleconsultation in France. We hypothesize that higher levels of health literacy are associated with more positive perceptions and greater intention to use teleconsultation services.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide online survey of 1,163 French adults between December 2020 and January 2021. The proposed conceptual model integrates three key dimensions of health literacy—understanding, access, and evaluation—with core constructs from the technology acceptance model (TAM), including perceived usefulness, ease of use, trust, and intention. The model was tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).
Results: The structural equation model explains 54.2% of the variance in teleconsultation adoption. While health literacy dimensions positively influence perceived ease of use, two of them—understanding and access—showed a surprising negative impact on perceived usefulness. Trust in teleconsultation emerges as a key mediating factor between literacy and adoption. All paths in the model are statistically significant.
Conclusion: This study provides novel empirical evidence that patients’ health literacy significantly shapes their attitudes toward and intention to use teleconsultation, although not always in the expected direction. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring digital health services to diverse literacy profiles and call for further research to better understand the nuanced effects of literacy in digital healthcare environments.
Downloads
References
Kickbusch I, Maag D. Health Literacy. In: Kris Heggenhougen and Stella Quah, editors. International Encyclopedia of Public Health. Vol 3. San Diego: Academic Press; 2008. pp. 204–211.
Kjeldsted E, Lindblad KV, Bødtcher H, Sørensen DM, Rosted E, Christensen HG, et al. A population-based survey of patients’ experiences with teleconsultations in cancer care in Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acta Oncol. 2021;60(10):1352–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1956688
Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(12):2072–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050
Nutbeam D. Evaluating health promotion—progress. problems and solutions. Health Promot Int. 1998;13(1):27–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/13.1.27
Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-80
Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-658
Sørensen K, Pelikan JM, Röthlin F, Ganahl K, Slonska Z, Doyle G, et al. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur J Public Health. 2015;25(6):1053–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv043
Haun JN, Patel NR, French DD, Campbell RR, Bradham DD, Lapcevic WA. Association between health literacy and medical care costs in an integrated healthcare system: a regional population based study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0887-z
Pelikan JM, Ganahl K, Van den Broucke S, Sørensen K. Measuring health literacy in Europe: introducing the European health literacy survey questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q). In: Okan O, Bauer U, Levin-Zamir D, et al., editors. International handbook of health literacy. Bristol: Policy Press; 2019, p. 115–38.
Jordan JE, Buchbinder R, Briggs AM, Elsworth GR, Busija L, Batterham R, et al. The health literacy management scale (HeLMS): a measure of an individual’s capacity to seek. understand and use health information within the healthcare setting. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91(2):228–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.013
Davis FD. Perceived usefulness. Perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13:319–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci. 1989;35:982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46:186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW. Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Q. 2003;27(1):51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
Becker J-M, Klein K, Wetzels M. Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Plann. 2012;45:359–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001
Diamantopoulos A, Sarstedt M, Fuchs C, Wilczynski P, Kaiser S. Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. J Acad Mark Sci. 2012;40:434–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP. Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Q. 2011;35:293–334. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044045
Jarvis CB, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J Consum Res. 2003;30: 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/376806
Tenenhaus M, Amato S, Esposito Vinzi V. A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modelling. In: Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting 2004, p. 739–42.
Wetzels M, Odekerken-Schröder G, Van Oppen C. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Q. 2009;33(1):177–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
Barbeite FG, Weiss EM. Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior. 2004;20(1):1–5.
Bhattacherjee A, Hikmet N. Physicians’ resistance toward healthcare information technologies: A dual-factor model. In 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’07). 2007. (pp. 141–141). IEEE.
Urstad KH, Andenaes R, Wahl AK, Kvarme LG, Helseth S, Moum T. The health literacy questionnaire: Initial validity testing in a Norwegian sample. HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2020;4(4):e190–e199.
Belanche D, Casaló LV, Flavián C. Integrating trust and personal values into the Technology Acceptance Model: The case of e-government services adoption. Cuad Econ Dir Empresa. 2012;15:192–204.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Corinne Rochette, PhD, Norbert Lebrument, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Telehealth and Medicine Today (THMT).
THMT is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
