Flipping the Script: Low-Income Cancer Patients Lead in Telehealth Use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v10.610Keywords:
Cancer survivors, digital divide, health equity, low-income patients, oncology care, socioeconomic disparities, telehealthAbstract
While telehealth has rapidly expanded across the U.S. healthcare landscape, prevailing assumptions suggest that low-income populations face the most significant barriers to access. However, emerging evidence from national datasets challenges this assumption, indicating that some low-income populations, particularly cancer patients, engage in telehealth at higher rates than their higher-income counterparts. This study examines differences in telehealth utilization between low-income and higher-income U.S. adults with a history of cancer and explores the sociodemographic and structural factors associated with higher telehealth engagement among low-income patients. A quantitative, correlational analysis was conducted using pooled cross-sectional data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), 2011 to 2023. The sample included adult cancer survivors stratified by household income relative to the federal poverty level. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between income and telehealth use, controlling for predisposing (age, gender, race/ethnicity), enabling (education, employment, insurance), and need-based (self-reported health status) variables. Low-income cancer patients were significantly more likely to use telehealth services compared to their higher-income counterparts (AOR 1.084; 95% CI 1.02–1.15; p<.01), even after adjusting for enabling factors. Among the low-income group, individuals employed in the past year and those with higher educational attainment had even greater odds of telehealth engagement. Women and middle-aged adults also reported higher utilization than men and older adults. Contrary to dominant narratives, these findings suggest that low-income cancer patients actively engage in virtual care when appropriate enabling conditions are present.
Downloads
References
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2024. Atlanta (GA): ACS; 2024.
Yang W, Williams JH, Hogan PF, Bruinooge SS, Rodriguez GI, Kosty MP, et al. Projected supply of and demand for oncologists in the United States, 2020–2030. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(1):39–45.
Campos-Castillo C, Anthony DL. Racial and ethnic differences in self-reported telehealth use during the COVID-19 pandemic: a secondary analysis of a US survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(1):119–25.
Roberts ET, Mehrotra A. Assessment of disparities in digital access among Medicare beneficiaries and implications for telemedicine. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(10):1386–9.
Velasquez D, Mehrotra A. Ensuring the growth of telehealth during COVID-19 does not exacerbate disparities in care. Health Aff Blog [Internet]. 2020 May 5 [cited 2025 Aug 28]. Available from: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20200505.591306
Patel SY, Mehrotra A, Huskamp HA, Uscher-Pines L, Ganguli I, Barnett ML. Variation in telemedicine use and outpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021;40(2):349–58.
Rodriguez JA, Betancourt JR, Sequist TD, Ganguli I. Differences in the use of telephone and video telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Manag Care. 2021;27(1):21–6.
Eberly LA, Khatana SAM, Nathan AS, Snider C, Julien HM, Deleener ME, et al. Telemedicine outpatient cardiovascular care during the COVID-19 pandemic: bridging or opening the digital divide? Circulation. 2020;142(5):510–2.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CMS framework for health equity 2022–2032 [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): CMS; 2022 [cited 2025 Aug 28]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/
Health Resources & Services Administration. Telehealth programs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): HRSA; 2023 [cited 2025 Aug 28]. Available from: https://telehealth.hhs.gov/
Federal Communications Commission. Affordable Connectivity Program [Internet]. Washington (DC): FCC; 2023 [cited 2025 Aug 28]. Available from: https://www.fcc.gov/acp
Sirintrapun SJ, Lopez AM. Telemedicine in cancer care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018;(38):540–5.
Shaverdian N, Gillespie EF, Cha E, Lee P, Benvengo S, Chino J, et al. Impact of telemedicine on patient satisfaction and perceptions of care quality in radiation oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(10):1174–80.
Sabesan S, Kelly J. Are teleoncology models acceptable to patients in rural settings? J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20(3):135–8.
Nunez-Smith M, Wolf E, Huang HM, Chen PG. Quality of care in the COVID-19 era: a global perspective. Lancet. 2021;398(10298):103–5.
National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2011–2023. Hyattsville (MD): NCHS; 2023.
Blewett LA, Drew JAR, Griffin R, King ML, Williams KCW. IPUMS Health Surveys: National Health Interview Survey, Version 7.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis (MN): IPUMS; 2024. Available from: https://nhis.ipums.org/nhis/
Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36(1):1–10.
Zhai Y. A call for addressing barriers to telemedicine: health disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(1):64–6.
Lopez AM, Lam K, Thota R. Barriers and facilitators to telemedicine: can you hear me now? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021;41:25–36.
Fischer SH, Ray KN, Mehrotra A, Bloom EL, Uscher-Pines L. Prevalence and characteristics of telehealth utilization in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2022302.
Institute of Medicine. Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2013.
US Department of Agriculture. ReConnect Loan and Grant Program [Internet]. Washington (DC): USDA; 2023 [cited 2025 Aug 28]. Available from: https://www.usda.gov/reconnect
American Society of Clinical Oncology. Telehealth in oncology: ASCO standards and practice recommendations. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(17):1925–9.
Wang T, Hernandez C, Lee S. Long-term clinical outcomes associated with telehealth use among oncology patients: a multicenter cohort study. Cancer Med. 2024;13(5):2456–65.
Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, Bashshur N, Yellowlees PM. The empirical evidence for telemedicine interventions in mental disorders. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(2):87–113.
Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, Brooks M. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016242.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elaine Chambers

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Telehealth and Medicine Today (THMT).
THMT is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.











