Digital Health: A Market Survey of Multinational Companies and Lessons From Global Peers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v11.689Keywords:
artificial intelligence, Brazil, digital health adoption, global comparison, pharmaceutical industryAbstract
Background: Digital health increasingly influences pharmaceutical research, evidence generation, and patient engagement strategies worldwide. However, the pace and pattern of adoption differ substantially across markets, and few scientific publications examine how pharmaceutical companies incorporate these tools into their operations. Here, the authors evaluate the status of digital health adoption among multinational pharmaceutical companies operating in Brazil and compare these findings with regulatory and market developments in the United States, Europe, and Canada.
Methods: A structured survey was administered to 37 multinational pharmaceutical companies representing approximately 40% of companies operating in Brazil. The questionnaire explored stage of adoption, priority use cases, objectives, governance structures, workforce preparation, perceived barriers, and collaboration patterns. Brazilian findings were compared to international regulatory frameworks and recent industry analyses.
Results: Among respondents, 43% reported scaling digital health initiatives, 16% were piloting or planning projects, 19% were exploring the field, and 5% reported full integration at the enterprise level. The most frequent areas of focus were AI and machine learning (65%), patient engagement platforms (51%), and big-data analytics (49%), whereas telemedicine and electronic health record (EHR) integration (8%) were comparatively underdeveloped. Primary objectives included improving medication adherence (60%), enhancing patient outcomes (51%), and reducing costs (43%). Only 38% of companies reported having a dedicated digital health team, and fewer than half offered formal staff training. Cybersecurity, interoperability, and organizational resistance were the most significant barriers. Collaboration with technology companies, startups, providers, and academic institutions was reported by 77% of respondents.
Conclusions: Multinational pharmaceutical companies in Brazil demonstrate strong interest and activity in AI and data-driven approaches but face limitations related to governance, workforce readiness, interoperability, and regulatory alignment. Addressing these areas may allow Brazilian affiliates to more fully realize near-term opportunities in adherence programs, real-world evidence generation, and decentralized clinical research.
Downloads
References
1. IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science. Digital health trends 2024: implications for research and patient care [Internet]. 2024 Dec 12 [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.iqvia.com/insights/the-iqvia-institute/reports-and-publications/reports/digital-health-trends-2024
2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Digital health technologies for remote data acquisition in clinical investigations: guidance for industry, investigators, and other stakeholders [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/155022/download
3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidances with digital health content [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/guidances-digital-health-content
4. European Medicines Agency. Real-world evidence framework to support EU regulatory decision-making – 3rd report [Internet]. 2025 Feb [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/report/real-world-evidence-framework-support-eu-regulatory-decision-making-3rd-report-experience-gained-regulator-led-studies-february-2024-february-2025_en.pdf
5. Canada Health Infoway. 2022 Canadian digital health survey [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://insights.infoway-inforoute.ca/2022-digital-health-survey
6. Deloitte. 2024 outlook for life sciences: AI priorities and governance signals [Internet]. 2023 Dec 5 [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/insights/industry/life-sciences/life-sciences-industry-outlook.html
7. Arnold & Porter LLP, Axios. Life sciences firms move ahead on AI, with concerns [Internet]. 2024 Nov 14 [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.axios.com/2024/11/14/life-sciences-ai-governance-concerns
8. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA). Improving access to digital therapeutics in Europe [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.efpia.eu/media/636408/improving-access-to-digital-therapeutics-in-europe.pdf
9. Galen Growth, Evaluate. Pharmaceutical digital health innovation index 2024 [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.galengrowth.com/product/pharmaceutical-digital-health-innovation-index-2024
10. Research2Guidance. Only 13% of partnerships between startups and healthcare companies are successful [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://research2guidance.com/only-13-of-partnerships-between-startups-and-healthcare-companies-are-successful
11. Keck A, Wolff J, Gretscher P. From potential to proof: how artificial intelligence in healthcare now delivers measurable return on investment—and why many companies risk falling behind. In: Bohr A, Memarzadeh K, editors. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in healthcare. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2025. p.197–206.
12. International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE). The 7th ISPE Pharma 4.0™ survey: digital transformation. Pharm Eng [Internet]. 2024;44(5):32–39 [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://ispe.org/pharmaceutical-engineering/2024-09/pharma-40-survey-results
13. The impact of telemedicine on the pharmaceutical industry. Telehealth Med Today [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://telehealthandmedicinetoday.com/index.php/journal/article/view/589/
14. Dupuy S, Opincar L, Pandya K, et al. An update from the benchmark survey of phactMI member companies on providing medical information in the digital space. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024;58(1):200–213. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00587-1
15. DeLuca MJ, Rai R, Pandya K, et al. Benchmarking medical information services beyond unsolicited requests: a phactMI benchmarking survey. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025;59(4):848–858. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00787-x
16. Barrias A, Di Lauro E, Dunnett S, et al. European pharmaceutical industry medical information: a role in providing medicine-related information to patients. Pharm Med. 2024;38(5):399–405. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-024-00534-x
17. Ge Y, Yao D, Ung COL, et al. Digital medical information services delivered by pharmaceutical companies via WeChat: qualitative analytical study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e43812. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/43812
18. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS). 2023 healthcare cybersecurity survey [Internet]. 2024 Mar 1 [cited 2026 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.himss.org/resources/2023-healthcare-cybersecurity-survey
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jefferson G. Fernandes, MD, PhD, MBA, Andreas Keck, MD

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Telehealth and Medicine Today (THMT).
THMT is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










