Surgical Patient Experience with a Novel Telemedicine Program in the COVID-19 Era
Keywords:telemedicine, telehealth, COVID, surgery, colorectal, otolaryngology
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, measures were taken to decrease viral spread by transitioning health care appointments to virtual mediums. This study evaluates the use of telemedicine within the Divisions of Colon and Rectal Surgery and Otolaryngology-Neurotology at a single academic institution during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Study Design: An online survey modeled after the TeleENT Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Medical Communication Competence Scale (MCCS) was administered to gauge patient’s experience with Electronic Medical Record-based telemedicine visits.
Results: Participants noticed several advantages of telemedicine visits over traditional in-office visits: shorter visits, saving money, and avoiding potential exposure during the pandemic. A total of 36% at least somewhat agreed that the quality of care was hindered by the lack of a physical examination;61.7% participants at least somewhat agreed that they prefer a face-to-face visit rather than telemedicine consultation. Most patients were satisfied with the care they received via telemedicine (Likert 6.19/7) and 95.8% would use telemedicine again. Participants self-reported an average saving of $108.70 when using telemedicine. When comparing the telemedicine cohort with the in-office control, the telemedicine patients noticed an improved ability to communicate with their physician in five out of eight domains of the MCCS.
Conclusion: Surgical preoperative consultation, postoperative follow-up, and routine visits were conducted via telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, representing a new direction for surgical appointments and consultations. This study shows that telehealth can provide satisfactory care and increases access to surgical care for patients when external factors prevent the traditional physician–patient interaction. With better-perceived communication via telemedicine appointments, patients may subjectively feel that they can express their symptoms and gather information from the doctor regarding their diagnosis more efficiently.
1. Model Policy for The Appropriate Use of Telemedicine Technologies in the Practice of Medicine. FSMB; 2014 [cited 2020 Jun 8]. Available from: https://www.fsmb.org/siteassets/advocacy/policies/fsmb_telemedicine_policy.pdf
2. Mobile fact sheet. Pew Research Center; 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 8]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/
3. Viers BR, Lightner DJ, Rivera ME, et al. Efficiency, satisfaction, and costs for remote video visits following radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2015;68(4):729–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.002
5. Gunter RL, Chouinard S, Fernandes-Taylor S, et al. Current use of telemedicine for post-discharge surgical care: A systematic review. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(5):915–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.01.062
6. Safir IJ, Gabale S, David SA, et al. Implementation of a tele-urology program for outpatient hematuria referrals: Initial results and patient satisfaction. Urology. 2016;97:33–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.066
7. Cain SM, Moore R, Sturm L, et al. Clinical assessment and management of general surgery patients via synchronous telehealth. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(2):371–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X16636245
9. Valsangkar NP, Eppstein AC, Lawson RA, Taylor AN. Effect of lean processes on surgical wait times and efficiency in a tertiary care veterans affairs medical center. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(1):42–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2808
10. Dean P, O’Donnell M, Zhou L, Skarsgard ED. Improving value and access to specialty medical care for families: A pediatric surgery telehealth program. Can J Surg. 2019;62(6):436–41. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.005919
12. Mullen-Fortino M, Rising KL, Duckworth J, et al. Presurgical assessment using telemedicine technology: Impact on efficiency, effectiveness, and patient experience of care. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25(2):137–42. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0133
13. Paquette S, Lin JC. Outpatient telemedicine program in vascular surgery reduces patient travel time, cost, and environmental pollutant emissions. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;59:167–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.01.021
14. Schroeder C. Pilot study of telemedicine for the initial evaluation of general surgery patients in the clinic and hospitalized settings. Surg Open Sci. 2019;1(2):97–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2019.06.005
15. Catanese S, Pentheroudakis G, Douillard JY, Lordick F. ESMO Management and treatment adapted recommendations in the COVID-19 era: Pancreatic cancer. ESMO Open. 2020;5(Suppl 3). https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000804
16. Contreras CM, Metzger GA, Beane JD, et al. Telemedicine: Patient-provider clinical engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04623-5
22. Layfield E, Triantafillou V, Prasad A, et al. Telemedicine for head and neck ambulatory visits during COVID-19: Evaluating usability and patient satisfaction. Head Neck. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26285
23. Mascagni D, Eberspacher C, Mascagni P, et al. From high volume to “zero” proctology: Italian experience in the COVID era. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03622-x
24. Pignatti M, Pinto V, Miralles MEL, et al. How the COVID-19 pandemic changed the Plastic Surgery activity in a regional referral center in Northern Italy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.05.002
25. Plocienniczak MJ, Noordzij JP, Grillone G, et al. Guidelines for resident participation in otolaryngology telehealth clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820932133
26. Shipchandler TZ, Nesemeier BR, Parker NP, et al. Telehealth opportunities for the otolaryngologist: A silver lining during the COVID-19 pandemic. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820929641
29. Vecchione L, Stintzing S, Pentheroudakis G, et al. ESMO management and treatment adapted recommendations in the COVID-19 era: Colorectal cancer. ESMO Open. 2020;5. https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000826
30. Walędziak M, Różańska-Walędziak A, Pędziwiatr M, et al. Bariatric surgery during covid-19 pandemic from patients’ point of view-the results of a national survey. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061697
31. Seim NB, Philips RHW, Matrka LA, et al. Developing a synchronous otolaryngology telemedicine clinic: Prospective study to assess fidelity and diagnostic concordance. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(5):1068–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26929
33. American College of Surgeons. COVID-19: Recommendations for management of elective surgical procedures 2020. [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.facs.org/covid-19/clinical-guidance/elective-surgery
34. Ungar OJ, Handzel O, Cavel O, Oron Y. A smartphone-based weber test may discriminate between a conductive and a sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol Neurotol. 2019;24(4):191–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000502274
35. Buvik A, Bugge E, Knutsen G, et al. Patient reported outcomes with remote orthopaedic consultations by telemedicine: A randomised controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25(8):451–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X18783921
36. Goedeke J, Ertl A, Zöller D, et al. Telemedicine for pediatric surgical outpatient follow-up: A prospective, randomized single-center trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(1):200–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.014
37. Hwa K, Wren SM. Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: Results of a pilot program. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(9):823–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2672
38. Kummerow BK, Roumie CL, Stewart MK, et al. Implementation of a telephone postoperative clinic in an integrated health system. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(4):644–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.07.010
39. Nikolian VC, Williams AM, Jacobs BN, et al. Pilot study to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and financial implications of a postoperative telemedicine program. Ann Surg. 2018;268(4):700–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002931
40. Soegaard Ballester JM, Scott MF, Owei L, et al. Patient preference for time-saving telehealth postoperative visits after routine surgery in an urban setting. Surgery. 2018;163(4):672–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.08.015
42. Shapiro SB, Lipschitz N, Kemper N, et al. Early experience with telemedicine in patients undergoing otologic/neurotologic procedures. Otol Neurotol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002774
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Rachel M. Segal, BS, Jared Matson, MD, Omid Moshtaghi, MD, Elina Vaidya, Elina Kari, MD, Rick Friedman, MD, Sonia Ramamoorthy, MD, Jeffrey P. Harris, MD, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Telehealth and Medicine Today (TMT).
TMT is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.