Neurology and Telemedicine: The Way Forward


  • Partha S. Ray Consultant Neurologist and Clinical Neurophysiologist, National Health Service England at the Walton Centre for Neurology Liverpool and Clinical Lecturer Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK; and National Professor in Neurology of Indian Medical Association, New Delhi, India
  • Nirmal Surya Consultant Neurologist and Chairman Surya Neuro Centre, Marine Lines, Mumbai, India; and Epilepsy Foundation Chair - Developing World Forum SIG, WFNR President- Indian Federation of Neuro-Rehabilitation (IFNR), Mumbai, India



COVID-19, India, internet, neurologist, tele-neurology


Objective: During the coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) times, we have all learned to appreciate the advantages of communicating with each other on the digital or virtual format. This included both social, commercial and professional settings. This was necessitated through the restrictions on direct physical contact mandated by the pandemic. Through innovations and adaptations, the practice of medicine has also changed with telemedicine, triggered by ‘necessity is the mother of invention’ concept being embraced by both patients and physicians. Neurology, traditionally seen as a complex speciality and the preserve of a couple of thousand practising neurologists in the country, has opened itself up to the telemedicine or tele-neurology format very easily in the anecdotal and a few pilot studies conducted globally and in India.

Design: Despite the initial misgivings and anticipation of patient reluctance to adopt this technology, the real-world experience has been, to the contrary, where both young and old patients have readily embraced the new medium and cooperated with the neurologists to improve their care, which would otherwise have been severely restricted in the COVID-19 times. The neurologists have also adapted to the new way of working to deliver optimum diagnosis and care plans.

Outcome measures: There have been technical glitches (in form of internet connectivity, smartphone hardware and software problems and lighting and camera angle and image stabilization issues to name a few), which have been reduced with practice and innovation. Feedback from neurologists, patients, and their carers via regular audits and questionnaires are being circulated, and practice parameters are being improved (IFNR survey- Ref 5). The contribution of national regulatory agencies, such as the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), and stakeholders, such as the Telemedicine Society of India (TSI), has been phenomenal to facilitate the tele-neurology practice and make it safe for all stakeholders.

Results: In a country of 1.37 billion population and only 2,500 accredited neurologists, there is a need for tele-neurology to be able to serve patients living in remote areas in mountains and coastal areas, and also in poorly connected areas on the plains. This becomes paramount for patients requiring specialised acute neurological care and to improve access, which now becomes a practical feasibility on the digital format to bring neurology to the doorsteps of the people.

Follow-up care of patients, epidemiological studies of various neurological chronic illnesses and their audit will become realities cutting down on costs and time to access quality neurological care using the digital format for 21st-century India.

Conclusions: Tele-neurology is no longer a vision, but a reality precipitated by the pandemic, the needs and aspirations of the Indian population, and the technological infrastructure India has achieved in the last 20 years.


Download data is not yet available.


Misra UK, Kalita J, Mishra SK, Yadav RK. Telemedicine in neurology: underutilized potential. Neurol India 2005; 53: 27–31. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.15047

Ganapathy K. Distribution of neurologists and neurosurgeons in India and its relevance to the adoption of telemedicine. Neurol India 2015; 63: 142–54. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.156274

Ganapathy K. Telemedicine and neurosciences. Neurol India 2018; 66: 642–51. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.232346

Ganapathy K. Telemedicine and neurological practice in the Covid-19 era. Neurol India 2020; 68: 555–9. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.288994

Surya N. Education, training & practices of neurorehabilitation in India during the Covid 19 pandemic. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 13. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.626399

Guzik AK, Switzer JA. Teleneurology is neurology. Neurology 2020; 94(1): 16–17. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008693

New Telemedicine Regulations by Govt of India – May 2020. [cited 2020 May 14] Available from:

Vibha D, Srivastava MVP, Prasad K, Tripathi M, Srivastava AK, Bhatia R, et al. Connecting in Covid 19: neurology tele-follow-up experience. medRxiv 2020.07.13.20153171. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.13.20153171

Ganapathy K. Deployment of telemedicine in neurosciences: the good and the evil – a balanced approach. Neurol India 2018; 66: 1852–3. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.246295

Govindarajan R, Anderson ER, Hesselbrock RR, Madhavan R, Moo LR, Mowzoon N, et al. Developing an outline for teleneurology curriculum AAN Telemedicine Work Group recommendations. Neurology 2017; 89(9): 951–959. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004285

Rajan R, Radhakrishnan DM, Srivastava AK, Vishnu VY, Gupta A, Shariff A, et al. Conduct of virtual neurology DM final examination during Covid-19 pandemic. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2020; 23: 429–32.

Slide set: of Canadian Association of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (CAMP&R). Virtual physical examination for PM&R during Covid-19 and beyond July 23, 2020 Speakers: Dr. Paul Winston, MD, FRCPC, Dr. McKyla McIntyre, MD, MSc Moderator: Dr. Larry Robinson, MD, FABPMR.

Al Hussona M, Maher M, Chan D, Micieli J, Jain J, Khosravani H, et al. The virtual neurologic exam: instructional videos and guidance for the Covid-19 era. Can J Neurol Sci 2020; 47(5): 598–603. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2020.96

Ansary AM, Martinez JN, Scott JD. The virtual physical exam in the 21st century. J Telemed Telecare 2019. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19878330

Tanaka MJ, Oh LS, Martin SD, Berkson EM. Telemedicine in the era of Covid-19 the virtual orthopaedic examination. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2020; 102(12): e57. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00609

Padma MV. ‘Telestroke’: an Indian approach to telemedicine. J Pract Cardiovasc Sci 2017; 3: 2–4. doi: 10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_13_17

Arboix A, Sánchez MJ. Advantages of telestroke in rural areas. Neurol India 2016; 64: 941–2. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.190251

Sharma S, Padma MV, Bhardwaj A, Sharma A, Sawal N, Thakur S. Telestroke in resource-poor developing country model. Neurol India 2016; 64: 934–40. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.190243

Renjen PN, Chaudhari D. Telemedicine and stroke: Stroke Emergency Mobile Unit – a new approach to stroke care. Neurol India 2016; 64, Suppl S1: 110–2. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.178050

Patel UK, Malik P, DeMasi M, Lunagariya A, Jani VB. Multidisciplinary approach and outcomes of tele-neurology: a review. Cureus. 2019;11(4): e4410. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4410

Gowda GS, Manjunatha N, Kulkarni K, Bagewadi VI, Shyam RP, Basavaraju V, et al. A collaborative tele-neurology outpatient consulation service in Karnataka: seven years of experience from a tele-medicine center. Neurol India 2020; 68: 358–63. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.280644

Garg D, Dhamija RK. Teleneurorehabilitation for Parkinson’s disease: a panacea for the times to come? Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2020; 23: 592–7. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_566_20



How to Cite

Ray, P. S. ., & Surya , N. . (2021). Neurology and Telemedicine: The Way Forward. Telehealth and Medicine Today, 6(2).



Special Issue - Articles