A Multidisciplinary Team in Ambulatory Management of Diabetes Mellitus Using Telehealth Among a Sample of Medicaid Patients

Authors

  • Nicole Henley California State University San Bernardino
  • Dorothy Chen-Maynard California State University, San Bernardino
  • Erin Pablo-Bandong STG International https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9942-5233

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30953/tmt.v7.309

Keywords:

A1c, LDL, cholesterol, diabetes, dietitian, pharmacist, telehealth, telemedicine

Abstract

Objectives:  Effective treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus requires a multidisciplinary approach. Our study provided telemedicine healthcare delivery, using a model of collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) protocol incorporating medical nutrition therapy (MNT) interventions by Dietitians and Pharmacists. 

Methods:  We conducted a retrospective chart review of patient data collected between December 2014 and December 2015. We compared five intervention groups of patients (n=12,370) receiving different levels of treatment from Pharmacists, Registered Dietitian/Nutritionist, and/or the Call Center, using Telemedicine consultation techniques over a one-year period. The control group received their supplies through the mail without any contacts with the Call Center, Pharmacists, or Dietitians.  The cross-sectional data collected for A1c were analyzed using ANOVA to assess for within-group differences in A1c reduction among groups with different risk factors.

Results:  Roughly, 18 percent of study participants were identified as high-risk, with a serum A1c level greater than 10%.  Lower A1c and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels were reported for patients who received at least four prescription refills over the study period, (-0.113 and -4.931, respectively).  Results reveal that average A1c levels for the intervention groups were lower compared to the control group. Overall, interventions led by Dietitians and Pharmacists resulted in a higher reduction in A1c levels in the high-risk group of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Conclusions:  This study showed that using Telemedicine consultation, led by Dietitians and Pharmacists, resulted in a more effective intervention for patients with diabetes and resulted in a positive change of lowering plasma A1c levels and LDL cholesterol as a secondary outcome.  For future study, using the same multidisciplinary intervention and telehealth format, a longitudinal data collected over a minimum of 6-months would allow for tracking of changes in A1c and LDL cholesterol in the individuals with type 2 diabetes. 

Keywords: Diabetes, Telemedicine, Telehealth, Pharmacist and Dietitian led intervention, A1c, LDL cholesterol

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nicole Henley, California State University San Bernardino

Department of Health Science and Human Ecology, Associate Professor

Dorothy Chen-Maynard, California State University, San Bernardino

Department of Health Science and Human Ecology, Professor

Erin Pablo-Bandong, STG International

Clinical Pharmacy Specialist

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Type 2 diabetes. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/basics/type2.html [cited 29 September 2021].

American Diabetes Association. Statistics: the cost of diabetes: the staggering cost of diabetes Internet]. Available from: https://www.diabetes.org/resources/statistics/cost-diabetes [cited 29 September 2021].

Nathan DM. The diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: overview. Diabetes Care 2014; 37(1): 9–16. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2112

Campbell L. Diabetes guidelines: easier to preach than to practice? The Med J Australia 2006; 185: 305–9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00583.x

Housden L, Wong ST, Dewes M. Effectiveness of group medical visits for improving diabetes care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2013; 185: 635–44. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130053

Mundt MP, Agneessens F, Tuan WJ, Zakletskaia LI, Kamnetz SA, Gilchrist VJ. Primary care team communication networks, team climate, quality of care, and medical costs for patients with diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Inter J Nurs Studies 2016; 58: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.013

Isaksson U, Hajdarevic S, Abramsson M, Stenvall J, Hornsten A. Diabetes empowerment and needs for self-management support among people with type 2 diabetes in a rural inland community in northern Sweden. Scand J Caring Sci 2015; 29: 521–7. doi: 10.1111/scs.12185

Zgibor JC, Songer TJ. External barriers to diabetes care: addressing personal and health system issues. Diabetes Spectrum 2001; 14(1): 23–8. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.14.1.23

Silva-Tinoco R, Cuatecontzi-Xochitiotzi T, De la Torre-Saldena V, Leon-Garcia E, Serna-Alvarado J, Guzman-Olvera E, et al. Role of social and other determinants of health in the effect of a multicomponent integrated care strategy on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Equity Health 2020; 19: 75. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01188-2

Davidson MB. How our current medical care system fails people with diabetes: lack of timely, appropriate clinical decision. Diabetes Care 2009; 32(2): 370–2. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2046

Choe HM, Mitrovich S, Dubay D, Hayward RA, Krein SL, Vijan S. Proactive case management of high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes by a clinical pharmacist: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Manag Care 2005; 11: 253–60.

Cohen LB, Taveira TH, Wu WC, Pirraglia PA. Pharmacist-led telehealth disease management program for patients with diabetes and depression. J Telemed Telecare 2020; 26(5): 294–302. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18822575

Daly A, Michael P, Johnson EQ, Harrington CC, Patrick S, Bender T. Diabetes white paper: defining the delivery of nutrition services in Medicare medical nutrition therapy vs Medicare diabetes self-management training programs. J Am Diet Assoc 2009; 109(3): 528–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.11.004

Campbell, RK. Role of the pharmacist in diabetes management. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2002; 59(Suppl 9): S18–21. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.suppl_9.S18

Bains SS, Egede LE. Association between health literacy, diabetes knowledge, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control in a lower income population with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Tech Therap 2011; 13: 335–41. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0160

Osborn CY, Baines SS, Egede LE. Health literacy, diabetes self-care, and glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Tech Therap 2010; 12: 913–19. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0058

Nigam S. Telehealth and telemedicine: using technology to extend the reach and offset the insufficient supply of healthcare professionals. TMT [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 September 30];1(1). Available from: https://telehealthandmedicinetoday.com/index.php/journal/article/view/68

Taylor AM, Bingham J, Schussel K, Axon D, Dickman DR, Boesen K, et al. Integrating innovative telehealth solutions into an interprofessional team-delivered chronic care management pilot program. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2018; 24(8): 813–18. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.8.813

Greenwood DA, Hankins AI, Parise CA, Spier V, Olveda J, Buss KA. A comparison of in-person, telephone, and secure messaging of type 2 diabetes self-management support. Diabetes Educ 2014; 40(4): 516–25. doi: 10.1177/0145721714531337

Davis RM, Hitche AD, Salaam MM, Herman WH, Zimmer-Galler IE, Mayer-Davis EJ. Telehealth improves diabetes self-management in an underserved community: diabetes telecare. Diabetes Care 2010; 33(8): 1712–17. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1919

Xu J, Hamadi HY, Hicks-Roof KK, Zeglin RJ, Bailey CE, Zhao M. Healthcare professionals and telehealth usability during COVID-19. TMT [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 September 30];6(3). Available from: https://telehealthandmedicinetoday.com/index.php/journal/article/view/270

Published

2022-01-31 — Updated on 2022-03-08

Versions

How to Cite

Henley, N., Chen-Maynard, D., & Pablo-Bandong, E. . (2022). A Multidisciplinary Team in Ambulatory Management of Diabetes Mellitus Using Telehealth Among a Sample of Medicaid Patients. Telehealth and Medicine Today, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30953/tmt.v7.309 (Original work published January 31, 2022)

Issue

Section

Original Clinical Research