Surmounting Barriers to Healthcare Data and Information: International Case Studies

Authors

  • Bharath Perugu, MBA Information Technology, ULV, Office Practicum, Fort Washington, Pensylvannia, USA
  • Varun Wadhwa, BS Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
  • Jin Kim, ME Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachsuetts, USA
  • Jenny Cai, BS (Candidate) Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0633-3716
  • Audrey Shin, BS (Candidate) Computer Science and Economics, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA
  • Amar Gupta, MBA/PhD Computer Science and Economics, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v8.428

Keywords:

coordinated care, digital health, electronic health record, electronic medical record, health informatics, healthcare, interoperability, standards adoption

Abstract

Objective: In this article, the authors review the progress in healthcare interoperability from 2010 to 2023 from an international perspective. Countries covered here include the Republic of China (Taiwan), the Republic of Croatia, the Republic of Estonia, and the Commonwealth of Australia. Interoperability, in the context of this paper, is “the ability to share information across time and space from multiple devices, sources, and organizations,” as defined by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). This is followed by recommendations for future work toward improving the standardization of heterogeneous data in the healthcare setting.

Methodology: A literature review was conducted on established interoperability standards and systems in healthcare based on information obtained from journal publications, government, academy reports, published materials, and publicly available websites. Examples of specific interoperability efforts and an evaluation of their feasibility were conducted at three levels of healthcare interoperability, as defined by the National Academy of Medicine: 1) inter-facility (macro-tier) interoperability, 2) intra-facility (meso-tier) interoperability, and 3) Point-of-Care (micro-tier) interoperability. The authors assessed the adoption levels of each standard by looking at factors that support or limit its systemic adoption. Estimations on the number of users—medical professionals and patients—for each system were made in instances where verifiable data are available.

Results: Presented here is an evaluation of four interoperability parameters: 1) device/equipment interoperability, 2) compatibility issues, 3) involved organizations, and 4) migration and conversion issues.

Conclusions: Despite many parallel ongoing efforts to improve the standardization of healthcare information in the mobile devices, Internet of Things (IoT), and electronic health records (HER) sectors, there remains space for improvement. The recent development of the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA)  framework has significantly reduced the friction of data exchange in many healthcare contexts. In addition, funding architectures for mediating data between separate healthcare organizations, or middleware architectures, may also be an effective strategy for consolidating healthcare data and improving information exchange.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

NIST [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2023 Jun 24]. Systems Interoperability Group. Available from: https://www.nist.gov/itl/ssd/systems-interoperability-group

Lesh K, Weininger S, Goldman JM, Wilson B, Himes G. Medical device interoperability-assessing the environment. In: Proceedings of the 2007 joint workshop on high confidence medical devices, software, and systems and medical device plug-and-play interoperability [Internet]. USA: IEEE Computer Society; 2007 [cited 2023 Apr 26]. p. 3–12. (HCMDSS-MDPNP ’07). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/HCMDSS-MDPnP.2007.22

Pronovost PJ, National Academy of Medicine (U.S.), editors. Procuring Interoperability: achieving high-quality, connected, and person-centered care. Washington, DC: NAM.EDU; 2018. 1 p. (Learning health system series).

Interoperability, composability, and their implications for distributed simulation: towards mathematical foundations of simulation interoperability | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 24]. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6690487

2 Mapping other code systems to SNOMED CT—data analytics with SNOMED CT—SNOMED confluence [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 2]. Available from: https://confluence.ihtsdotools.org/display/DOCANLYT/5.2+Mapping+Other+Code+Systems+to+SNOMED+CT

International Classification of Diseases (ICD) [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases

Chute CG, Huff SM, Ferguson JA, Walker JM, Halamka JD. there are important reasons for delaying implementation of the new ICD-10 coding system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr;31(4):836–42. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1258

Jenco M. Ditch the spoon AAP: metric dosing of medications a safer choice. AAP News. 2015 Apr 1;36(4):11–11.

First Global Forum on Human Resources for Health 2–7 March 2008 Kampala, Organization WH, Alliance GHW. Report on the first global forum on human resources for health. 2010 [cited 2023 May 8]; Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70834

National eHealth Strategy Toolkit [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/national-ehealth-strategy-toolkit

The use of health information technology in seven nations| Commonwealth Fund [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 15]. Available from: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/journal-article/2011/apr/use-health-information-technology-seven-nations

People on the move [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. People on the move—Chapter 4: out and about. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/digpub/eumove/bloc-4.html?lang=en

Dumortier J, Verhenneman G. Legal regulation of electronic health records: a Comparative analysis of Europe and the US. In: George C, Whitehouse D, Duquenoy P, editors. eHealth: legal, ethical and governance challenges [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013 [cited 2023 May 8]. p. 25–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22474-4_2

Capture Calendar | European Union, archived by Publications Office of the European Union | Archive-It Wayback Machine [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://wayback.archive-it.org/12090/*/https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ehealth-action-plan-2012-2020-innovative-healthcare-21st-century

The 2012 ageing report: economic and budgetary projections for the 27 EU Member States (2010–2060)—European Commission [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2012/2012-ageing-report_en.htm

Internet of things, smart sensors, and pervasive systems: enabling connected and pervasive healthcare—ScienceDirect [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780128153680000014

Simalatsar A, De Micheli G. Medical guidelines reconciling medical software and electronic devices: Imatinib case-study. In: 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Bioinformatics & Bioengineering (BIBE); 2012. p. 19–24.

World Bank Open Data [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Individuals using the internet. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org

Metsallik J, Ross P, Draheim D, Piho G. Ten years of the e-Health System in Estonia. Semantic Scholar. 2018;2336. Available from: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2336/MMHS2018_invited.pdf [Cited 31 May 2023].

Estonian eHealth Foundation (EeHF) | Antilope ProjectAntilope Project [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.antilope-project.eu/antilope-project-partners/estonian-ehealth-foundation/

The emergence of National Electronic Health record architectures in the United States and Australia: models, costs, and questions—PMC [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550638/

TEHIK [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Avaleht. Available from: https://www.tehik.ee/avaleht

de Lusignan S, Ross P, Shifrin M, Hercigonja-Szekeres M, Séroussi B. Comparison of approaches to providing patients access to summary care records across old and new Europe: an exploration of facilitators and barriers to implementation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013 Aug 7;192:397–401.

Health Services Organisation Act. Estonian Parliament. 2007 Dec. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/60517/61928/F-2104585905/EST-60517.pdf

Heston T. A case study in blockchain healthcare innovation [Internet]. Rochester, NY; 2017 [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3077455

Atkinson C, Bostan P, Draheim D. Foundational MDA patterns for service-oriented computing. J Object Technol. 2015;14(1):1:1.

Oderkirk J. Readiness of electronic health record systems to contribute to national health information and research [Internet]. Paris: OECD; 2017 Dec [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/readiness-of-electronic-health-record-systems-to-contribute-to-national-health-information-and-research_9e296bf3-en

Zeegers Paget D, Azzopardi Muscat N, Zeegers Paget D, Jakab Z, Andriukaitis V, Charpak Y. European Public Health News. Eur J Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;29(2):381–4. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz032

Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) | Clay County PHC, MO [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 1]. Available from: https://www.clayhealth.com/251/Prescription-Drug-Monitoring-Program-PDM

Priisalu J, Ottis R. Personal control of privacy and data: Estonian experience. Health Technol. 2017;7(4):441–51. doi: 10.1007/s12553-017-0195-1

The Health Systems and Policy Monitor [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Health systems in Transition (HiT) Profile of Croatia. Available from: https://www.pf.uni-lj.si/media/raziskava.delovanja.zdravstvenih.sistemov.pdf

Ericsson Nikola Tesla d.d.—Electronic Healthcare Exchange—EHE [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.ericsson.hr/en/electronic-healthcare-exchange

Gvozdanović D, Koncar M, Kojundzic V, Jezidzić H. National healthcare information system in Croatian primary care: the foundation for improvement of quality and efficiency in patient care. Inform Prim Care. 2007 Feb 1;15:181–5. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v15i3.657

State of Health in the EU: Croatia Country Health Profile 2021. OECD/European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (2021), Croatia: Country Health Profile 2021, State of Health in the EU, OECD Publishing, Paris/European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Brussels.

Budin A, Tesla EN. e-health: Challenges and lessons learned—AEMH 2017. Availble from: https://www.aemh.org/images/AEMH_documents/2017/AndreaBudin.pdf

Croatia to start the exchange of ePrescriptions and patient summaries [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.digitalhealthnews.eu/development/5814-croatia-to-start-the-exchange-of-eprescriptions-and-patient-summaries

Mountford N, Kessie T, Quinlan M, Maher R, Smolders R, Van Royen P, et al. Connected health in Europe: where are we today? [Internet]. University College Dublin; 2016 the Authors [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/8523

Pearce C, Bainbridge M. A personally controlled electronic health record for Australia. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul 1;21(4):707–13. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002068

E-health in Australia and elsewhere: a comparison and lessons for the near future—PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23823284/

Hanna L, Gill SD, Newstead L, Hawkins M, Osborne RH. Patient perspectives on a personally controlled electronic health record used in regional Australia. Health Inf Manag J Health Inf Manag Assoc Aust. 2017 Jan;46(1):42–8. doi: 10.1177/1833358316661063

[PDF] Sound Foundations: leveraging International Standards for Australia’s National Ehealth System | Semantic Scholar [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Sound-Foundations%3A-Leveraging-International-for-Williams-McCauley/735350b86741d037827f3e98bd09f082ac8a125e?p2df

NASH PKI certificates for software vendors and developers—National Authentication Service for Health—Services Australia [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/nash-pki-certificates-for-software-vendors-and-developers?context=23091

PulseIT [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Mechanics of PCEHR are driving us mad. Available from: https://privacy.org.au/Papers/PCEHR-131122.pdf

Practice Incentives Program—Services Australia [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/practice-incentives-program

Andrews L, Gajanayake R, Sahama T. The Australian general public’s perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR). Int J Med Inf. 2014 Dec;83(12):889–900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.002

Wu TY, Majeed A, Kuo KN. An overview of the healthcare system in Taiwan. Lond J Prim Care. 2010 Dec;3(2):115–9. doi: 10.1080/17571472.2010.11493315

Design and prototype of a mechanism for active on-line emerging/notifiable infectious diseases control, tracking and surveillance, based on a national healthcare card system—PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17379353/

An Assessment of the Interoperability of Electronic Health Record Exchanges Among Hospitals and Clinics in Taiwan—PMC [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6458540/

National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://eng.nhi.gov.tw/en/mp-2.html

New NHI Mobile App Brings NHI Services at Your Fingertips-National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare-NEWS [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://eng.nhi.gov.tw/en/cp-244-94ba4-8-2.html

Creating online personal medical accounts: recent experience in two developed countries—ScienceDirect [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2211883718301783?via%3Dihub

Tseng YT, Chang EH, Kuo LN, Shen WC, Bai KJ, Wang CC, et al. Preliminary physician and pharmacist survey of the National Health Insurance PharmaCloud system in Taiwan. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017 Oct 1;149:69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.07.004

Rau HH, Wu YS, Chu CM, Wang FC, Hsu MH, Chang CW, et al. Importance-performance analysis of personal health records in Taiwan: a web-based survey. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 27;19(4):e131. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7065

Machiavelli N. The Prince [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2023 May 8]. Available from: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1232/1232-h/1232-h.htm

Published

2023-07-24

How to Cite

Perugu, MBA, B., Wadhwa, BS, V., Kim, ME, J., Cai, BS (Candidate), J. ., Shin, BS (Candidate), A. ., & Gupta, MBA/PhD, A. . (2023). Surmounting Barriers to Healthcare Data and Information: International Case Studies. Telehealth and Medicine Today, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v8.428

Issue

Section

Narrative/Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analysis

Most read articles by the same author(s)