Early Prediction of Preeclampsia by Using Ensemble Machine Learning With MM-XAI Approach

Authors

  • Sari Puspita, S.Si, M.Si Program Study of Information System, Faculty of Information Technology and Creative Industries, Universitas Metamedia, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8270-3878
  • Gusrino Yanto, S.Kom, M.Kom Program Study of Information System, Faculty of Information Technology and Creative Industries, Universitas Metamedia, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4192-5143
  • Rifa Turaina, S.Kom, M.Kom Program Study of Information System, Faculty of Information Technology and Creative Industries, Universitas Metamedia, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Nency Extise Putri, S.Kom, M.Kom Program Study of Information System, Faculty of Information Technology and Creative Industries, Universitas Metamedia, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v11.663

Keywords:

ensemble of machine learning, LIME, multi-method XAI, preeclampsia, SHAP

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy complication that endangers the mother and fetus. Early detection is necessary to prevent serious complications. Here, the authors employ mixed methods, which combine quantitative and qualitative approaches to design a preeclampsia risk prediction system for pregnant women. The system uses four machine learning algorithms: logistic regres-sion, decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF). We conducted the evaluation process by using a multi-method explainable AI (XAI) approach with Shapley additive explanations, local interpretable model-agnostic expla-nations, and permutation feature importance to enhance the transparency and ease of  interpretation of  the results. Clinical variables included systolic and diastolic blood pressure, blood glucose, body temperature, heart rate, age, and urine protein. The results show that RF and SVM achieved the highest accuracy (78%) with relatively stable performance across risk cate-gories. Multi-method XAI analysis indicated that blood pressure and blood glucose frequently appeared among influential features, although their relative importance varied depending on the model and explainability method. However, due to the limited dataset size and use of  internal validation only, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and multi-method XAI  early  identification  of   preeclampsia  risk  factors,  not  to  replace  clinical  diagnosis  or  function  as  a  standalone  clinical  decision-making tool.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Brownfoot F, Rolnik DL. Prevention of preeclampsia. Vol. 93, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Bailliere Tindall Ltd; 2024.

2. Erez O, Romero R, Jung E, Chaemsaithong P, Bosco M, Suksai M, et al. Preeclampsia and eclampsia: the conceptual evolution of a syndrome. Vol. 226, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Elsevier Inc.; 2022. p. S786–803.

3. Aziz F, Khan MF, Moiz A. Gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia as the risk factors of preeclampsia. Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 1;14(1).

4. Yang S, Zhou W, Dimitriadis E, Menkhorst E. Maternal blood lipoprotein cholesterol prior to and at the time of diagnosis of preeclampsia: a systematic review. 2025; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.

5. Auger N, Ayoub A, Bilodeau-Bertrand M, Lafleur N, Wei SQ. Ethnocultural status and risk of preeclampsia in a Canadian setting. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2025 Mar 1;39.

6. Ives CW, Sinkey R, Rajapreyar I, Tita ATN, Oparil S. Preeclampsia—Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentations: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Vol. 76, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Elsevier Inc.; 2020. p. 1690–702.

7. Bergman L, Hannsberger D, Schell S, Imberg H, Langenegger E, Moodley A, et al. Cerebral infarcts, edema, hypoperfusion, and vasospasm in preeclampsia and eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;

8. Lee ST, Lee YL, Chen YC, Lin W, Wu CI, Lin CK. Arteriovenous malformation-related headache and seizures in pregnancy masquerading as eclampsia: A case report. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul 1;63(4):552–6.

9. Shinde S, Yelverton CA, Yussuf M, Nurhussien L, Wang D, Fawzi WW. Effects of vitamin and multiple micronutrient supplementation for pregnant and/or lactating women on maternal and infant nutritional status in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Advances in Nutrition [Internet]. 2025 Aug;100487. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2161831325001231

10. Liu Z, Zhang Z, Yang H, Wang G, Xu Z. An innovative model fusion algorithm to improve the recall rate of peer-to-peer lending default customers. Intelligent Systems with Applications. 2023 Nov 1;20.

11. Liu Q, Li J, Li Y. Safety of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy and effectiveness in infants: a Danish national cohort study 2019-2023. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2025 Mar 20;

12. Macdonald TM, Walker SP, Hannan NJ, Tong S, Uhevaha T’, Kaitu’u-Lino J. Clinical tools and biomarkers to predict preeclampsia. EBioMedicine [Internet]. 2022;75:103780. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

13. Talukdar D, Sarkar M, Ahrodia T, Kumar S, De D, Nath S, et al. Previse preterm birth in early pregnancy through vaginal microbiome signatures using metagenomics and dipstick assays. iScience. 2024 Nov 15;27(11).

14. Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, Karumanchi SA, McCarthy FP, Saito S, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis, and management recommendations for international practice. Vol. 72, Hypertension. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2018. p. 24–43.

15. Ansbacher-Feldman Z, Syngelaki A, Meiri H, Cirkin R, Nicolaides KH, Louzoun Y. Machine-learning-based prediction of pre-eclampsia using first-trimester maternal characteristics and biomarkers. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022 Dec 1;60(6):739–45.

16. Jhee JH, Lee S, Park Y, Lee SE, Kim YA, Kang SW, et al. Prediction model development of late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning-based methods. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8).

17. Liu M, Yang X, Chen G, Ding Y, Shi M, Sun L, et al. Development of a prediction model on preeclampsia using machine learning-based method: a retrospective cohort study in China. Front Physiol. 2022 Aug 12;13.

18. Kovacheva VP, Eberhard BW, Cohen RY, Maher M, Saxena R, Gray KJ. Preeclampsia Prediction Using Machine Learning and Polygenic Risk Scores from Clinical and Genetic Risk Factors in Early and Late Pregnancies. Hypertension. 2024 Feb 1;81(2):264–72.

19. Tiruneh SA, Rolnik DL, Teede HJ, Enticott J. Prediction of pre-eclampsia with machine learning approaches: Leveraging important information from routinely collected data. Int J Med Inform. 2024 Dec 1;192.

20. Wang L, Ma Y, Bi W, Meng C, Liang X, Wu H, et al. An early screening model for preeclampsia: utilizing zero-cost maternal predictors exclusively. Hypertension Research. 2024 Apr 1;47(4):1051–62.

21. Khalil A, Bellesia G, Norton ME, Jacobsson B, Haeri S, Egbert M, et al. The role of cell-free DNA biomarkers and patient data in the early prediction of preeclampsia: an artificial intelligence model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Nov 1;231(5):554.e1-554.e18.

22. Wesson JL, Smith N. A machine learning model to predict preeclampsia in pregnant women. In: Procedia Computer Science. Elsevier B.V.; 2024. p. 1645–52.

23. Kota S. Kota Padang Dalam Angka 2024 [Internet]. Bps.go.id. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Padang; 2024 [cited 2025 Nov 20]. Available from: https://padangkota.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/02/28/c4991c8e8aeffe085e50de1e/kota-padang-dalam-angka-2024.html

24. DINAS KESEHATAN KOTA PADANG [Internet]. Padang.go.id. 2022 [cited 2025 August 21]. Available from: https://dinkes.padang.go.id/profil-kesehatan-dinkes.

25. DINAS KESEHATAN KOTA PADANG [Internet]. Padang.go.id. 2024 [cited 2025 August 21]. Available from: https://dinkes.padang.go.id/laporan-tahunan-dinkes.

26. Ye H. Artificial intelligence combined with computed tomography or X-ray radiography: Potential solution for opportunistic screening for osteoporosis. European Journal of Radiology Artificial Intelligence [Internet]. 2025 Sep;3:100036. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S3050577125000349

27. Kyriakopoulos N, Kim E, Hultink EJ, Santema S. The impact of design thinking and artificial intelligence capabilities on performance: The role of new product development decision-making agility. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2025 Nov;200:115633. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0148296325004564

28. García-Torres M, Saucedo F, Divina F, Gómez-Guerrero S. RFMSU: A multivariate symmetrical uncertainty-based random forest. Pattern Recognit. 2026 Jan 1;169.

29. Malik V, Agrawal N, Prasad S, Talwar S, Khatuja R, Jain S, et al. Prediction of Preeclampsia Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review. Cureus [Internet]. 2024 Dec 20; Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/325163-prediction-of-preeclampsia-using-machine-learning-a-systematic-review

30. Chen X, Chen H, Nan S, Kong X, Duan H, Zhu H. Dealing With Missing, Imbalanced, and Sparse Features During the Development of a Prediction Model for Sudden Death Using Emergency Medicine Data: Machine Learning Approach. JMIR Med Inform. 2023;11.

31. Layton AT. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Preeclampsia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol [Internet]. 2025 Feb;45(2):165–71. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.321673

32. Wahyuningsih T, Manongga D, Sembiring I, Wijono S. Comparison of Effectiveness of Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, and Random Forest Algorithms in Predicting Student Arguments. In: Procedia Computer Science. Elsevier B.V.; 2024. p. 349–56.

33. Hassanpouri Baesmat K, Shokoohi F, Farrokhi Z. SP-RF-ARIMA: A sparse random forest and ARIMA hybrid model for electric load forecasting. Global Energy Interconnection. 2025 Jun 1;

34. Harizahayu H, Friendly F, Purwo Seputro B, Benar B, Hermanto K. Predictive Modeling of Preeclampsia Risk Using Random Forest Algorithm within a Machine Learning Framework. Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing [Internet]. 2024 Oct 17;6(4):1843–50. Available from: https://jurnal.itscience.org/index.php/CNAPC/article/view/4779

35. Yanto G, Puspita S. A Random Forest Algorithm For High-Risk Pregnancies Prediction Based On Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Communications in Mathematical Biology and Neuroscience. 2025;2025.

36. Supsermpol P, Huynh VN, Thajchayapong S, Chiadamrong N. Predicting financial performance for listed companies in Thailand during the transition period: A class-based approach using logistic regression and random forest algorithm. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2023 Sep 1;9(3).

37. Belsti Y, Moran L, Du L, Mousa A, De Silva K, Enticott J, et al. Comparison of machine learning and conventional logistic regression-based prediction models for gestational diabetes in an ethnically diverse population; the Monash GDM Machine learning model. Int J Med Inform. 2023 Nov 1;179.

38. Lakshmi BN, Indumathi TS, Ravi N. A Study on C.5 Decision Tree Classification Algorithm for Risk Predictions During Pregnancy. Procedia Technology. 2016;24:1542–9.

39. Zhao R, Hong L, Ji H, Zhang Q, Zhang S, Li Q, et al. Decision tree based parameter identification and state estimation: Application to Reactor Operation Digital Twin. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2025 Jul;57.

40. Gao Y, Wang Y, Tian L, Hong X, Xue C, Li D. Evolving adaptive and interpretable decision trees for cooperative submarine search. Defence Technology [Internet]. 2025 Feb; Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214914725000467

41. Jiang N, Li P, Feng Z. Detecting tropical freshly-opened swidden fields using a combined algorithm of continuous change detection and support vector machine. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2025 Feb 1;136.

42. Shetty NP, Shetty J, Hegde V, Dharne SD, Kv M. A machine learning-based clinical decision support system for effective stratification of gestational diabetes mellitus and management through Ayurveda. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2024 Nov 1;15(6).

43. Piazza M, Spinelli A, Maggioni F, Bedoni M, Messina E. A robust support vector machine approach for Raman data classification. Decision Analytics Journal. 2025 Sep 1;16.

44. Raghunath MP, Deshmukh S, Chaudhari P, Bangare SL, Kasat K, Awasthy M, et al. PCA and PSO based optimized support vector machine for efficient intrusion detection in internet of things. Measurement: Sensors. 2025 Feb 1;37.

45. Mohamad Deros SN, Naim MR, Din NM. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to interpret the contributing factors of land subsidence susceptibility prediction model. Total Environment Advances. 2025 Sep 1;15.

46. Nimmy SF, Hussain OK, Chakrabortty RK, Saha S. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in glaucoma assessment: Advancing the frontiers of machine learning algorithms. Knowl Based Syst. 2025 May 12;316.

47. G UM, P UM. SmartScanPCOS: A feature-driven approach to cutting-edge prediction of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome using Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Heliyon. 2024 Oct 30;10(20).

48. Han J, Guzman JA, Chu ML. Prediction of gully erosion susceptibility through the lens of the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method using a stacking ensemble model. J Environ Manage. 2025 May 1;383.

49. Mehdiyev N, Majlatow M, Fettke P. Integrating permutation feature importance with conformal prediction for robust Explainable Artificial Intelligence in predictive process monitoring. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2025 Jun 1;149.

50. Ramirez SG, Hales RC, Williams GP, Jones NL. Extending SC-PDSI-PM with neural network regression using GLDAS data and Permutation Feature Importance. Environmental Modelling and Software. 2022 Nov 1;157.

51. Hassan SU, Abdulkadir SJ, Zahid MSM, Al-Selwi SM. Local interpretable model-agnostic explanation approach for medical imaging analysis: A systematic literature review. Vol. 185, Computers in Biology and Medicine. Elsevier Ltd; 2025.

52. Ali M. Classification of imbalanced travel mode choice dataset with SMOTE and prediction using interpretable machine learning. Sustainable Futures. 2025 Dec 1;10.

53. Aruleba I, Sun Y. Enhanced credit risk prediction using deep learning and SMOTE-ENN resampling. Machine Learning with Applications. 2025 Sep;21:100692.

54. Yusoff M, Mahmud Y, Azmi PAR, Sallehud-din MTM. The improvement of SMOTE-ENN-XGBoost through Yeo Johnson strategy on Dissolved Gas Analysis dataset. Energy Reports. 2025 Jun 1;13:6281–90.

55. Kohan AA, Mirshahvalad SA, Hinzpeter R, Kulanthaivelu R, Avery L, Ortega C, et al. External Validation of a CT-Based Radiogenomics Model for the Detection of EGFR Mutation in NSCLC and the Impact of Prevalence in Model Building by Using Synthetic Minority Over Sampling (SMOTE): Lessons Learned. Acad Radiol. 2025;

56. Shamshuzzoha M, Audry TTB, Alam MJ, Bhuiyan ZA, Motaharul Islam M, Hassan MM. A novel framework for seasonal affective disorder detection: Comprehensive machine learning analysis using multimodal social media data and SMOTE. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 1;256.

57. Dash D, Kumar M, Patra S, Kumar A, Ganguly A. Healthcare Fraud Detection Using an Integrated ML Approach with SMOTE. In: Procedia Computer Science. Elsevier B.V.; 2025. p. 800–10.

58. Xu H, Li H, Fan Y, Wang Y, Li Z, Zhou L, et al. Analysis of factors influencing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients using a random forest model. Breast. 2025 Jun 1;81.

59. Hapsari GI, Munadi R, Erfianto B, Irawati ID. Feature Selection Using Pearson Correlation for Ultra-Wideband Ranging Classification. Jurnal RESTI. 2025 Apr 1;9(2):209–17.

60. Li W, Chen S, Lin L, Chen L. Random-forest-based task pricing model and task-accomplished model for crowdsourced emergency information acquisition. Systems and Soft Computing. 2025 Dec 1;7.

61. Mehaba N, Schrade S, Eggerschwiler L, Dohme-Meier F, Schlegel P. Accuracy and precision in DM intake prediction models for lactating dairy cows. Animal. 2025 Jul 1;19(7).

62. Fukuda S, Yamamoto N, Tomita Y, Matsumoto T, Shinohara T, Ohno T, et al. Development and validation of clinical prediction model for functional independence measure following stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2025 Feb 1;34(2).

63. Singh MP, Bisht N, Choudhary M, Goswami A, Tagore NK. A Web-Based Supervised Machine Learning Model for Air Quality Index and Respiratory Care Prediction. In: Procedia Computer Science. Elsevier B.V.; 2025. p. 1747–56.

64. Zanchi M, Zapperi S, Bocchi S, Drofa O, Davolio S, La Porta CAM. Improving localized weather predictions for precision agriculture: A Time-Series Mixer approach for hazardous event detection. Environmental Modelling and Software. 2025 Jun 1;191.

65. Kumar V, prabha C, Gupta D, Juneja S, Kumari S, Nauman A. Multi-model machine learning framework for lung cancer risk prediction: A comparative analysis of nine classifiers with hybrid and ensemble approaches using behavioral and hematological parameters. SLAS Technol [Internet]. 2025 Aug;33:100314. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S247263032500072X

66. Soladoye AA, Aderinto N, Omodunbi BA, Esan AO, Adeyanju IA, Olawade DB. Enhancing Alzheimer’s disease prediction using random forest: A novel framework combining backward feature elimination and ant colony optimization. Curr Res Transl Med. 2025 Dec 1;73(4).

67. Zuege CV, Stefenon SF, Yamaguchi CK, Mariani VC, Gonzalez GV, Coelho L dos S. Wind speed forecasting approach using conformal prediction and feature importance selection. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems. 2025 Jul 1;168.

68. Abekoon T, Sajindra H, Rathnayake N, Ekanayake IU, Jayakody A, Rathnayake U. A novel application with explainable machine learning (SHAP and LIME) to predict soil N, P, and K nutrient content in cabbage cultivation. Smart Agricultural Technology. 2025 Aug 1;11.

69. Shahzad MF, Xu S, Lim WM, Yang X, Khan QR. Artificial intelligence and social media on academic performance and mental well-being: Student perceptions of positive impact in the age of smart learning. Heliyon. 2024 Apr 30;10(8).

70. Velasquez JD. TechMiner: Analysis of bibliographic datasets using Python. SoftwareX. 2023 Jul 1;23.

71. Horsburgh JS, Black S, Castronova A, Dash PK. Advancing open and reproducible water data science by integrating data analytics with an online data repository. Environmental Modelling and Software. 2025 Apr 1;188.

Published

2026-03-31 — Updated on 2026-04-09

Versions

How to Cite

Puspita, S., Yanto, G., Turaina, R., & Putri, N. E. (2026). Early Prediction of Preeclampsia by Using Ensemble Machine Learning With MM-XAI Approach. Telehealth and Medicine Today, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v11.663 (Original work published March 31, 2026)

Issue

Section

Original Clinical Research