Reframing Equity: A Multi-Perspective Analysis of Telehealth Screening Tools Through the Lens of Patients and Clinicians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v8.439Keywords:
clinician perspective, co-design, digital literacy, patient centricity, patient engagement, patient perspective, techquity, telehealth literacyAbstract
Background: Telehealth usage increased dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic, but equitable access remains a concern. Patients lacking technology access, skills, and digital literacy may not benefit fully. Validated telehealth literacy screening instruments are lacking. This study evaluated existing tools from patient and clinician perspectives.
Methods: Five telehealth literacy screening tools were identified through a literature review: 1) Digital Literacy Self-Assessment Tool (DLSA), 2) Electronic Health Literacy Scale (eHEALS), 3) Digital Health Literacy Scale (DHCLS), 4) Telehealth Literacy Screening Tool (TLST), and 5) University of Alabama-Birmingham Technology Comfort Survey (TCS). Patients (n=44) and clinicians (n=24) completed an online survey rating each tool across domains of 1) User experience, 2) Engagement, 3) Relevance, and 4) Health literacy.
Results: Clinicians overall had greater technology comfort and more digital healthcare usage than patients. Patients ranked TCS highest overall, while clinicians preferred DHCLS. TLST performed well for both groups. All participants ranked eHEALS lowest. Patients valued simplicity and clarity while clinicians favored brevity and clinical focus.
Conclusion: Perspectives differed between patients and clinicians regarding optimal telehealth literacy screening tools. Screening instruments should align with key engagement drivers: access, competency, digital literacy, relevancy, trust, and preferences. Tailored tools co-designed with patients and clinicians can promote equitable telehealth adoption and engagement.
Downloads
References
Abernethy A, Adams L, Barrett M, Bechtel C, Brennan P, Butte A, et al. The promise of digital health: then, now, and the future. NAM Perspect. 2022:10.31478/202206e. https://doi.org/10.31478/202206e
Bouabida K, Lebouché B, Pomey MP. Telehealth and COVID-19 pandemic: an overview of the telehealth use, advantages, challenges, and opportunities during COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare. 2022 Nov;10(11):2293. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112293
Barron M, Mishra V, Lloyd S, Augenstein J. How to measure the value of virtual health care. harvard business review [Internet]. 2021 Jun 24 [cited 2023 Sep 12]; Available from: https://hbr.org/2021/06/how-to-measure-the-value-of-virtual-health-care
Ramsetty A, Adams C. Impact of the digital divide in the age of COVID-19. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1147–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa078
van Kessel R, Wong BLH, Clemens T, Brand H. Digital health literacy as a super determinant of health: more than simply the sum of its parts. Internet Interv. 2022 Feb 7;27:100500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2022.100500
Berkman N, DeWalt D. Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review. AHRQ Publ; 2004.
Health Literacy in healthy people 2030—healthy people 2030. health.gov [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 16]. Available from: https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/health-literacy-healthy-people-2030
EdTech Center. EdTech Center @ World Education. [cited 2023 Aug 22]. Digital Literacy Self-Assessment Tool. Available from: https://edtech.worlded.org/resource/digital-literacy-self-assessment-tool/
Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: the eHealth Literacy Scale. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Nov 14;8(4):e27. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27
Nelson LA, Pennings JS, Sommer EC, Popescu F, Barkin SL. A 3-item measure of digital health care literacy: development and validation study. JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 29;6(4):e36043. https://doi.org/10.2196/36043
Gillie M, Ali D, Vadlamuri D, Carstarphen KJ. Telehealth literacy as a social determinant of health: a novel screening tool to support vulnerable patient equity. J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 6(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-210024
Irfan A, Lever JM, Fouad MN, Sleckman BP, Smith H, Chu DI, et al. Does health literacy impact technological comfort in cancer patients? Am J Surg. 2022 Apr;223(4):722–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.08.006
Bird M, McGillion M, Chambers EM, Dix J, Fajardo CJ, Gilmour M, et al. A generative co-design framework for healthcare innovation: development and application of an end-user engagement framework. Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Mar 1;7(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00252-7
Health Collaboratory. The Health Collaboratory. [cited 2023 Sep 16]. Patient Shark Tank. Available from: https://www.healthcollaboratory.com/patientsharktank.html
SurveyMonkey [Internet]. San Mateo, CA: SurveyMonkey. Available from: www.surveymonkey.com
Greenwood S. Mobile technology and home broadband 2021. Pew Res Cent Internet Sci Tech [Internet]. 2021 Jun 3 [cited 2023 Sep 16]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/06/03/mobile-technology-and-home-broadband-2021/
Kalicki AV, Moody KA, Franzosa E, Gliatto PM, Ornstein KA. Barriers to telehealth access among homebound older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(9):2404–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17163
Garvin LA, Hu J, Slightam C, McInnes DK, Zulman DM. Use of video telehealth tablets to increase access for veterans experiencing homelessness. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;36(8):2274–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06900-8
Hughes HK, Canino R, Sisson SD, Hasselfeld B. A simple way to identify patients who need tech support for telemedicine. Harv Bus Rev [Internet]. 2021 Aug 10 [cited 2022 Oct 8]. Available from: https://hbr.org/2021/08/a-simple-way-to-identify-patients-who-need-tech-support-for-telemedicine
Jezewski E, Miller A, Eusebio M, Potter J. Targeted telehealth education increases interest in using telehealth among a diverse group of low-income older adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan;19(20):13349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013349
Piggott L, Piggott, Simon, Kelly, Maureen. Impact of telehealth implementation on non-consultant hospital doctors training experience [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 12]. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com
Sakumoto M, Jelinek R, Joshi AU. Identification of gaps in graduate medical education telehealth training. Telehealth Med Today [Internet]. 2021 Jul 30 [cited 2023 Sep 10];6(3). Available from: https://telehealthandmedicinetoday.com/index.php/journal/article/view/276
Liang L, Brach C. Health literacy universal precautions are still a distant dream: analysis of U.S. data on health literate practices. Health Lit Res Pract. 2017 Nov;1(4):e216–30. https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20170929-01
Kuek A, Hakkennes S. Healthcare staff digital literacy levels and their attitudes towards information systems. Health Informatics J. 2019 Apr 15;26:592–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219839613
Hodgkins M, Barron M, Jevaji S, Lloyd S. Physician requirements for adoption of telehealth following the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Npj Digit Med. 2021 Feb 9;4(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00390-y
Yee V, Bajaj SS, Stanford FC. Paradox of telemedicine: building or neglecting trust and equity. Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Jul 1;4(7):e480–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00100-5
Saadi A, Rodriguez JA. Addressing privacy concerns central to success of telehealth use among undocumented immigrants. Health Aff Forefr [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 16]. Available from: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20201118.621497/full/
Houser SH, Flite CA, Foster SL. Privacy and security risk factors related to telehealth services—a systematic review. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2023 Jan 10;20(1):1f.
SteelFisher GK, McMurtry CL, Caporello H, Lubell KM, Koonin LM, Neri AJ, et al. Video telemedicine experiences in COVID-19 were positive, but physicians and patients prefer in-person care for the future. Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Apr;42(4):575–84. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01027
Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Patient Preference Information (PPI) in medical device decision making. FDA [Internet]. 2023 Jul 3 [cited 2023 Sep 16]; Available from: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/cdrh-patient-science-and-engagement-program/patient-preference-information-ppi-medical-device-decision-making
Health Collaboratory. TechQuity tool for patient preferences [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 19]. Available from: http://techquity.health/
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Matthew Sakumoto, MD, Sarah Krug, MS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Telehealth and Medicine Today (THMT).
THMT is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
